Does exercise slow Parkinson’s? A seven-year study finds a link, but the differences are small

A study of 294 people with Parkinson’s, followed for up to seven years, links more physical activity to slower decline in thinking. What it measured, the numbers, and why it cannot prove cause.

Ctrl+Alt Science 3 min
A glowing purple outline of a walking figure inside a translucent brain shape, on a dark background

People with Parkinson’s disease who were more physically active had a slower decline in their thinking over up to seven years, according to a study in the journal Neurology. It is a useful finding, and an easy one to over-read.

The study shows an association. It does not show that exercise caused the slower decline.

What the study found

The American Academy of Neurology published the research on 7 October. The author named in the release is Dong-Woo Ryu, of the University of Cincinnati. It followed 294 people with mild to moderate Parkinson’s disease, with an average age of 66, for up to seven years.

A pair of worn walking shoes on a quiet park path at dawn, with soft mist between the trees
AI-generated illustration.

Participants reported how many hours a week they were active at work, at home and in their leisure time. The researchers then sorted them into three groups by total weekly activity: low, up to four hours; medium, four to eight hours; and high, more than eight hours.

The numbers

On a 30-point thinking and memory scale, the estimated average yearly decline was:

Activity groupWeekly activityYearly decline in thinking score
Lowup to 4 hours0.478 points
Medium4 to 8 hours0.090 points
Highmore than 8 hours0.007 points

The researchers adjusted for age, sex and how long people had had the disease. Compared with the low group, the high group had a slower decline in thinking and slower worsening of movement symptoms.

The release also gives yearly changes on a 0 to 132 movement scale, but describes some of them as decreases on a scale where a higher score means worse symptoms. We could not reconcile that wording without the paper, so we do not repeat those figures here.

Why the result needs caution

The release lists the limits itself. Activity was self-reported, so some people may not have remembered it accurately. Most people started with good thinking skills, so the results should be read with care. And the differences between groups were small.

A notebook with an empty weekly activity grid, a pen and a glass of water on a wooden table in morning light
AI-generated illustration.

There is also the question of which way the link runs. People who feel better may simply move more. An observational study like this one cannot separate the two.

What it means

Our reading: it adds to evidence that staying active is associated with doing better with Parkinson’s, and it gives a range of weekly hours to think about. It is not a prescription, and it does not say how much exercise any one person should do. Anyone with Parkinson’s should talk to their care team before changing their routine.

The work was funded by the Gardner Family Foundation and the Precision Medicine in Neurodegenerative Diseases Fund.

For other recent neurology stories, see brain implants giving people who lost their speech a voice again and Utah’s bionic arm that can feel.

What we could not confirm

We did not open the paper in Neurology or find its DOI, so the figures come from the academy’s release. We could not check the movement results. We have not found other researchers’ reactions.

ShareXWhatsApp

Leave a Reply

Your email address will not be published. Required fields are marked *